Man in Creepy ‘Chucky’ Doll Mask ARRESTED and Unmasked After Threatening to Kill Women
August 27, 2026
Man in Chucky doll mask identified as Zymire Hughes
A man in a creepy ‘Chucky’ doll mask accused of terrorizing and threatening women has been arrested in Las Vegas.
Zymire Hughes, 22, is accused of chasing over a dozen people in Center City Philadelphia on the morning of August 15.
Hughes asked women, “Are you ready to die?” as he chased them.
One woman severely injured her leg while fleeing from Hughes.
Hughes is facing charges of harassment, terroristic threats, simple assault, and intimidation.
The US Marshals helped local law enforcement track down Hughes at an apartment complex in Vegas.
“You think it’s funny to scare people? Well, get ready to get scared by us because we got the handcuffs, we got the jail cell, we got the Philly jury that’s going to tell you it’s not funny at all,” District Attorney Larry Krasner said on Thursday.
A man accused of terrorizing at least a half dozen people while wearing a Chucky-style mask near Philadelphia City Hall earlier this month was arrested Tuesday in Las Vegas, authorities said.
Zymire Hughes, 22, was arrested around 8 p.m. at an apartment complex in southeast Las Vegas and is being held in the Clark County Detention Center awaiting extradition back to Philadelphia, the U.S. Marshals Service said.
U.S. Marshals said Hughes has been a Las Vegas resident since February but has family in Philadelphia. They believe Hughes was in the city for a few weeks. He fled Philadelphia on Aug. 19 from Trenton-Mercer Airport in Ewing, New Jersey, to Orlando, Florida, and then took another flight to Vegas, they said.
“By hiding behind a Chucky-style Halloween mask, Hughes terrorized Philadelphia residents and believed he could evade law enforcement. He was wrong,” Robert Clark, the Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshal for the Eastern Pennsylvania Violent Crime Fugitive Task Force, said. “His arrest should send a clear message: you can hide your face, but you can’t hide from the elite investigators of the U.S. Marshal Service.”
Gavin Newsom claims he ‘didn’t even know’ about 5,000-bottle wine cellar at his $7.5M home
California Gov. Gavin Newsom and wife Jennifer Siebel Newsom are selling their $7.5 million Sacramento-area residence — yet the governor claims he was barely aware of one of the home’s key amenities.
At a press conference, the winemaker-turned-pol was put on the spot about whether he even filled the home’s massive 5,000-bottle wine cellar.
Newsom is winding down his time in the California capitol as he preps an expected White House run. Outside of Sacramento, the couple purchased a $9 million home in Marin County in 2024.
Photos of the wine cellar show a luxurious, open area with seating and rows of shelves locked behind a glass door. There appear to be books stacked inside the walls along with bottles of wine.
No one is buying it.
1. This is a boat load of BS.
2. Men that don’t know what goes on in their own homes are not men at all. https://t.co/jFj9rkxKkt
Lowell, in his letter to White House counsel David Warrington, said that trying to fire Cook based on Pulte’s referral “would ignore the facts and the law.”
Scavino’s Aug. 5 letter to Cook describes “two acts by Governor Cook that, ‘taken together,’ supposedly constitute grounds for her removal,” Lowell wrote. “But neither of those acts shows intentional wrongdoing or amounts to a crime, and neither constitutes ‘cause’ under the Federal Reserve Act.”
Lowell also noted that Trump himself, along with others in his administration including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Attorney General Todd Blanche, have reportedly also listed multiple properties as primary residences in the past.
“An inadvertent oversight is not fraudulent or criminal,” Lowell wrote. “Governor Cook’s apparent mistake on a form provided to her by her lender, which was aware of her other residences, was unintentional, not criminal, and occurred in her private capacity before she took office.”
Earlier this month, President Trump renewed efforts to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook after the Supreme Court ruled she could keep her job.
According to Fox News, President Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, sent a letter to Lisa Cook and informed her that Trump is considering removing her from her position over allegations of mortgage fraud.
“The letter asks Cook to send responses to allegations that she may have committed mortgage fraud within the next 21 days,” Fox News reported.
In June, the US Supreme Court said President Trump cannot fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
The high court, in a 5-4 vote, ruled that Trump cannot remove Cook.
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion.
“To accept any of those arguments would in effect transform the Federal Reserve’s for-cause protection into at-will employment,” Roberts wrote.
Justice Thomas dissented.
Lisa Cook filed a lawsuit against President Trump, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell after Trump fired her last summer.
The Trump Administration previously asked the US Supreme Court to intervene after a federal appeals court blocked Trump from firing Lisa Cook.
DOJ Solicitor General John Sauer, in his petition to the Supreme Court, said the lower courts have interfered with the President’s authority to remove members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors for cause.
Lisa Cook apparently owns three properties, and she allegedly committed mortgage fraud on all three properties.
According to housing regulator Bill Pulte’s first criminal referral, Lisa Cook committed mortgage fraud by lying on her mortgage application and falsifying bank statements when she designated her out-of-state Atlanta condo as her “primary residence”—just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home, which she also claimed as her “primary residence.”
Last August, Pulte sent a second criminal referral on Lisa Cook after she was allegedly caught lying about a third property.
Lisa Cook’s attorneys laughably claimed there would be an inflation crisis if Trump were allowed to fire Cook.
THEY’RE BACK: Far-Left Nonprofits Race Back to Obama Judge to Block Trump’s Postal Election Integrity Rules After Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction
August 27, 2026
District Judge Indira Talwani, District of Massachusetts
Left-wing voting organizations are racing back to Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in a renewed attempt to shut down President Donald Trump’s mail-ballot integrity rules before the November midterms.
On Wednesday, the plaintiffs filed a 29-page memorandum asking Talwani to immediately issue a temporary restraining order and then a preliminary injunction blocking the U.S. Postal Service’s final Ballot Mail for Federal Elections rule.
As The Gateway Pundit reported on Wednesday, Talwani conceded that, after Trump v. California, the League of Women Voters plaintiffs are “not likely to prevail as to ripeness” unless they rewrite their complaint now that the Postal Service has issued a final rule according to a nine-page order.
She didn’t do it happily. Reporting around the order makes clear the Supreme Court’s decision “compelled” her to toss the freeze even as she kept smearing the president’s election-integrity directive as likely to unleash “chaos.”
But the legal assault is already back.
The plaintiffs, including the League of Women Voters, U.S. Vote Foundation, OCA-Asian Pacific American Advocates, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, and several affiliated organizations, claim their amended complaint has now cured the ripeness defect identified by the Supreme Court because they are challenging the Postal Service’s final rule itself, rather than merely President Trump’s executive order directing the agency to begin rulemaking.
That distinction is at the center of the new fight.
The Supreme Court stayed Talwani’s related injunction on Monday after concluding that the earlier challenge was based on speculation about what USPS might eventually do.
The Court explained that federal judges review final agency rules, not proposals or internal presidential directives telling an agency to consider a rule.
The majority then explicitly left the door open for a later lawsuit, stating: “If the Postal Service’s final rule harms the States, they may challenge that rule.”
The high court did not decide whether the final USPS rules are constitutional. Its ruling addressed the threshold questions of standing and ripeness.
Talwani acknowledged that problem Wednesday when she vacated her earlier injunction, writing that the plaintiffs were unlikely to prevail on ripeness grounds unless they amended their complaint to reflect that a final rule had been issued. Her order expressly allowed them to return with a new request for an injunction.
They wasted no time.
According to the new emergency filing, the plaintiffs argue that the August 21 final rule makes the dispute “concrete and imminent beyond any doubt.” They accuse USPS of seizing powers over election administration that belong to the states and Congress and claim the rule violates the constitutional separation of powers.
The plaintiffs also argue that the rule is ultra vires, a legal term meaning that an agency has acted beyond the authority granted to it by Congress.
“USPS issued the Final Rule without statutory authority and in violation of the separation of powers,” the organizations claim.
This is the same basic theory Talwani accepted before the Supreme Court intervened on procedural grounds.
Outbound and return federal ballot envelopes must carry the official Election Mail logo, comply with automation standards, and include unique Intelligent Mail barcodes.
State and local election officials must use a federal ballot-mail portal to submit the voter’s name, address, originating state, and the unique barcodes associated with the outbound and return envelopes.
USPS employees will review outbound federal ballot mail before accepting it to determine whether the mailing complies with the preparation standards and whether the intended recipients were included on the state-submitted participation list.
Noncompliant outbound mailings will not be accepted and will be returned to the authorized ballot mailer so the errors can be corrected and the mailing resubmitted.
The Postal Service says the safeguards will improve tracking, visibility, operational efficiency, and fraud detection. The agency also insists that state officials, not USPS, will continue deciding who is eligible to vote and who belongs on each state’s mail-ballot list.
“The Postal Service will not play any role in determining voter eligibility, maintaining voter rolls, or counting ballots,” USPS stated in the final rule.
But the left-wing plaintiffs portray the new safeguards as a threat to mail voting itself.
They argue that voters could be disenfranchised if election officials fail to place them on the state-submitted list or use envelopes that do not meet the federal specifications. They also claim the requirements will force advocacy groups to rewrite voter-education materials weeks before the election.
The filing says U.S. Vote Foundation estimates that revisions to its online tools and website will cost approximately $50,000. Other plaintiffs claim their existing voter guides and outreach materials have been rendered incomplete or obsolete.
In other words, the same organizations that have spent years defending mass mail-in voting now want one Obama-appointed judge to stop uniform federal tracking and verification rules before they can be used in the 2026 election.
The plaintiffs are now asking Talwani to immediately block USPS from implementing or enforcing the final rule while the litigation proceeds.
Biden Regime Paid Hundreds of Influencers to Promote Dangerous COVID Vaccine While, at the Same Time, Censoring The Gateway Pundit for Reporting the Truth About Them
August 27, 2026
For years, the Biden Administration was censoring and bullying social media giants to censor, flag, and shadow-ban hundreds of articles by The Gateway Pundit that discussed the COVID pandemic and the dangerous experimental vaccines.
The Gateway Pundit found that our researched articles on the lab origins of COVID, dangers of the experimental vaccines, miscarriages, heart problems and deaths linked back to the COVID vaccines.
As you may recall, Missouri, Louisiana, The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft, along with epidemiologists Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff (Great Barrington Declaration authors), psychiatrist Aaron Kheriaty, and Louisiana activist Jill Hines filed the suir in May 2022.
We argued that White House officials, the Surgeon General, CDC, FBI, CISA, HHS, and others “coerced, threatened, and pressured” Facebook, Twitter/X, YouTube, and other platforms to remove, demote, or label content on:
COVID-19 origins (lab-leak theory)
Vaccine efficacy and side effects
Lockdowns and masks
2020 election integrity and mail-in voting
The Hunter Biden laptop story
Earlier this year, the case was finally settled. The Trump Justice Department and the remaining plaintiffs (Missouri, Louisiana, Hoft, Kheriaty, Hines) entered a 10-year consent decree in March 2026.
The settlement binds the Surgeon General, CDC, and CISA. Those entities and their employees may not:
Threaten Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, or YouTube with legal, regulatory, or economic punishment to induce removal, suppression, or algorithmic reduction of the plaintiffs’ protected speech
Unilaterally direct or veto those platforms’ content-moderation decisions
This was good news for The Gateway Pundit, First Amendment rights, and freedom in America.
Now we know, thanks to the great investigative journalist, Natalie Winters, that at the same time the Biden administration was censoring prominent voices who were CORRECTLY reporting on the dangers of the COVID vaccine and the origins of the China virus in Wuhan, they were paying influencers to promote their lies!
Via Natalie Winters:
CDC/HHS poured $80 MILLION+ into the program.
The influencer operation ran through El Beacon—a public-facing cutout created by Public Good Projects, which recruited 496 paid influencers.
The ads disclosed El Beacon—not the government funding it.
* Akinyi Ragwar — Fashion and personal-style creator.
* Alejandra Arce — Marketing, yoga, technology and lifestyle creator.
* Aline Freeman/USA Homemade — Home and lifestyle creator; real name unverified.
* Amelia Valentin — Singer, editor and on-air host.
* Ana Cruz — Bilingual journalist and founder of Rollos de Mujeres.
* Ana Molina — Latina lifestyle creator.
* Ana Victoria Perez — Fashion, shopping and lifestyle creator.
* Andreia Leifer — Fashion, beauty and lifestyle creator.
* Angelica Castaneda — Family, travel and lifestyle blogger.
* Araceli Bindrup — Family, fashion, home and travel creator.
* Awilda — Lifestyle creator; surname unverified.
* Bianca Fortney — Fashion, beauty and lifestyle creator.
* Carla Riojas — Singer-songwriter.
* Carmen Alvarez — Latino-literature book creator and library advocate.
* Carolina Abdala — Beauty, home, family and lifestyle creator.
* Cynthia Pratt — Arizona lifestyle and travel creator.
* Dalia Patron — Fashion, beauty and wellness creator.
* Dani Lynch — Utah social-media creator.
* David Tutera — Celebrity wedding planner and television host.
* Edna Freeman — Actress, author and motherhood creator.
* Erica Marques — Lifestyle, motherhood and sustainability creator.
* Fabio Dias — Technology-unboxing and product-review creator.
* Fridda Fernández — Latina lifestyle creator and communications professional.
* Genesis Lagos — Disney, family and travel creator.
* Guadalupe Ochoa — Fashion blogger behind Fellow Fashionista.
* Gustavo Finol — Fashion producer, public-relations professional and actor.
* Jennifer Lee, also known as Prickly Blonde — Thrift and sustainable-fashion creator.
* Jessica Moore — Budget-fashion, beauty and travel blogger.
* Juliana Separavic — Lifestyle and brand-content creator.
* Julie Hauptmann, also known as Jules Cali — Luxury-fashion, beauty and travel blogger.
* Karina Abdul — Fashion designer and founder of KABDUL.
* Kelsey Kaplan — Petite-fashion and motherhood blogger.
* Kristina Guerrero — Former E! News and Inside Edition correspondent.
* Lesley Argotti — Bilingual fashion and lifestyle creator and visual artist.
* Lisa Marie Borjas — Venezuelan fashion stylist and beauty creator.
* Lisette M. — Lifestyle creator; surname unverified.
* Lucas Labrador — Ballet dancer and dance entrepreneur.
* Marcelli Rodrigues — Personal trainer and beauty and fitness creator.
* Mariza Dávila-Madwid — Spanish teacher and lifestyle creator.
* Melany Cortázar — Makeup artist and makeup-academy founder.
* Meliza Vasquez — Photographer and lifestyle and fitness creator.
* Karen Asencio Viera, also known as Miss Karenni — Fashion and lifestyle creator.
* Noelia Alonso Duque — Model and content creator.
* Nubia Figueroa — Beauty, fashion and skincare creator.
* Omar Genao — E-commerce developer and digital-marketing consultant.
* Paola V. Desideri — Fashion, beauty and family creator.
* Parth Patel — Engineer and men’s-style and travel creator.
* Perla Aguilar — Fashion, beauty and lifestyle blogger.
* Ren, also known as Grunge Granny — Maker, small-business owner and lifestyle creator.
* Stephanie Bradford — Four-time Emmy-winning bilingual journalist.
* Stephanie Guerra — San Antonio culture creator and founder of Puro Pinche.
* Thayna Beddes — Instagram creator; specialty unverified.
* Thida, also known as Vibe in Style — Boston-area travel and lifestyle blogger.
* Camila Verônica Souza Freire, also known as V de Veronik — Medical-research and academic-skills creator.
* Vanessa Calderón — Actress, writer and filmmaker.
* Will Jardell — Amazing Race winner and public-health professional.
* Wilmarie Hernández — Life and career coach and travel creator.
Amazing!
The campaign reported 1,000 posts reaching 37.2 million people.
These ads promoting the COVID vaccine to pregnant women and children were all lies. We now know that Dr. Tony Fauci knew about these dangers but lied about it to the public – including his support for propaganda projects like this one!
So why is Tony Fauci NOT in prison right now?
There was a previous report on this propaganda campaign posted at NCBI.nlm.nih.gov in 2022.
Another Democrat Nutcase: US Senate Candidate N’Kiyla Jasmine Thomas Posts Extremely Unhinged Emotional Breakdown (VIDEO)
August 27, 2026
Democrat US Senate candidate in Oklahoma publishes a video calling for Markwayne Mullen a Christian nationalist and cutting out his image for her “burn book.”
This US Senate candidate from Oklahoma is your ‘winner of the week.”
The unhinged nutcase posted video of her self screaming, running into a pink bedroom, and ranting against “Christian nationalists!”
N’Kiyla cuts out a photo of Markwayne Mullin and then tapes it into her “Burn Book.”
This must be something they do on the left.
Obviously, she really doesn’t like Markwayne, the former US Senator and current Homeland Security Secretary.
Why did she think posting this was a good idea? Kentucky Girl found the video:
This is N’Kiyla Jasmine Thomas. She just won a runoff election in Oklahoma and is now the Democrat candidate for US Senate.
Here’s another video of crazy N’Kiyla and her chicken strips.
Thomas says she is a Black, White, and Native American (Chickasaw) woman.
She really loves her chicken strips!
Democrat N’Kiyla ‘Jasmine’ Thomas, who is running for the Oklahoma US Senate in the 2026 election, posted this video to her official campaign account earlier this week…
In a sane world the decision to film and then post this would disqualify her from any public office… pic.twitter.com/WtdYhfMzrx
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
