President Trump Asked If Supreme Court Justices Who Ruled Against His Tariffs Are Still Invited to the State of the Union (VIDEO)

President Trump Asked If Supreme Court Justices Who Ruled Against His Tariffs Are Still Invited to the State of the Union (VIDEO)

President Trump Asked If Supreme Court Justices Who Ruled Against His Tariffs Are Still Invited to the State of the Union (VIDEO)
February 20, 2026

Former President Donald Trump stands at a podium in front of the White House backdrop, flanked by American flags during a press conference.

President Trump held a press conference in the White House briefing room on Friday after the Supreme Court struck down his tariffs.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority by imposing tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act IEEPA.

Chief Justices Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch sided with the three liberal justices.

President Trump did not hold back during his presser. He scorched the justices for ruling against him.

Trump accused the justices of being swayed by foreign interests.

The President also unleashed on the conservative justices who joined the liberals and said they are an embarrassment to their families.

A reporter asked President Trump if the Supreme Court Justices who ruled against his tariffs are still invited to his State of the Union Address.

President Trump will deliver his State of the Union Address on Tuesday, February 24.

Trump made reporters laugh after he was asked if the justices were still invited.

“The Supreme Court Justices who ruled against the policy, striking it down… are they still invited to you State of the Union” And will you speak with them?” a reporter asked President Trump.

“Yeah, they are invited,” Trump said. “Barely… barely. Three are happily invited! No, no, they’re barely invited!

“Honestly, I couldn’t care less if they come,” Trump said.

WATCH:

The post President Trump Asked If Supreme Court Justices Who Ruled Against His Tariffs Are Still Invited to the State of the Union (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cristina Laila

“Trump Is Doing Something Radically Different.” – America’s Economist

“Trump Is Doing Something Radically Different.” – America’s Economist

“Trump Is Doing Something Radically Different.” – America’s Economist
February 20, 2026

(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and working with them through the links below which benefits Gateway Pundit. We appreciate your support!)

Donald Trump and a man in a light blue suit smile together at an event, showcasing a friendly interaction.

by Rachel Gearhart

Something crossed my desk recently that made me stop and pay attention.

The man known as America’s Economist – a former CIA analyst with connections to multiple Presidents including Clinton, Bush, and Trump – just bought 10,000 shares of a small $5 stock.

It’s not a stock many Americans have heard of.

But this connected economist learned the company is in a unique position as the SOLE American provider of one critical resource.

And he believes the White House may take a large stake in the company.

This is important.

Over the past year, the U.S. government has started backing companies tied to critical resources and national security. And when those announcements come, stocks have moved fast. Sometimes in days.

For example, when the Trump Administration took a stake in Trilogy Metals, the stock jumped 388% in just 8 days.

That’s why “America’s Economist” immediately bought shares.

He’s clearly anticipating a big move.

So he recorded a short presentation explaining what he’s seeing right now – and why those close to or in retirement may want to look at this company very closely before it becomes headline news.

You can watch it here…

Dr. Mark Skousen, a macroeconomic strategist, speaks in front of a blue background, wearing a hat and a plaid suit, with a play button overlay for video content.

But do it fast.

Because, based on what I’ve seen, the window to benefit from situations like this is usually short.

The post “Trump Is Doing Something Radically Different.” – America’s Economist appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Promoted Post

Tucker Carlson Addresses “Detainment” Incident at Israeli Airport for the First Time (VIDEO)

Tucker Carlson Addresses “Detainment” Incident at Israeli Airport for the First Time (VIDEO)

Tucker Carlson Addresses “Detainment” Incident at Israeli Airport for the First Time (VIDEO)
February 20, 2026

Tucker Carlson Show / Screenshot

 

Tucker Carlson has addressed the Daily Mail’s report that claimed he was detained in Israel.

In his latest interview, in which he sat down with U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, Tucker addressed the report on the detention incident.

Tucker at the start of the video shared that after the interview concluded with Huckabee, Israeli authorities were holding on to his and his producers’ passports.

The former Fox News host further shared that two of his producers “were called into rooms and given the third degree.”

After one of his producers left the room where he was being asked questions, he came out of the room and told Tucker, “That was the weirdest experience of my life. They asked me questions about the interview.”

Tucker added, “They were doing an intel op and humiliation exercise on my producer. This isn’t security. We are leaving right now!”

WATCH:

However, during his statement on the incident, Tucker Carlson never mentioned that he himself had been taken to a room and interrogated or detained, contradicting the Daily Mail’s report.

Shortly after the report went viral, security footage of Tucker Carlson taking a picture of a man at the airport went viral, with many users on X using the clip to refute Tucker’s claims about his team’s treatment at the airport.

LOOK:

Tucker addressed the security footage, saying the video was taken before the interview and that the man in the clip was his driver, not an airport employee.

After the initial report of the detention incident went viral, U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee released a statement sharing, “EVERYONE who comes in/out of Israel (every country for that matter) has passports checked & routinely asked security questions. Even ME going in/out with Diplomatic Passport & Diplomatic Visa.”

Watch the full interview:

The post Tucker Carlson Addresses “Detainment” Incident at Israeli Airport for the First Time (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Anthony Scott

WATCH: “I Don’t Think the Court Meant That, but It’s the Way It is” – Trump Says SCOTUS Actually Reaffirmed Tariff Powers, Announces 10% GLOBAL Tariffs and Investigation into Unfair Trading Practices of Other Countries and Companies

WATCH: “I Don’t Think the Court Meant That, but It’s the Way It is” – Trump Says SCOTUS Actually Reaffirmed Tariff Powers, Announces 10% GLOBAL Tariffs and Investigation into Unfair Trading Practices of Other Countries and Companies

WATCH: “I Don’t Think the Court Meant That, but It’s the Way It is” – Trump Says SCOTUS Actually Reaffirmed Tariff Powers, Announces 10% GLOBAL Tariffs and Investigation into Unfair Trading Practices of Other Countries and Companies
February 20, 2026

President Trump on Friday told reporters that he will impose new “global” tariffs on foreign imports of 10% following the Supreme Court’s ruling against his authority to impose the tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

In a stunning decision, SCOTUS invalidated tariffs under IEEPA on Friday, but Trump told reporters that the ruling actually confirms his authority to impose tariffs. “I don’t think the court meant that, but it’s the way it is,” he said.

“I can do anything I want with IEEPA, anything! I just can’t charge anybody for it. I can license. I just can’t charge them. It’s ridiculous, but it’s okay, because we have other ways, numerous other ways,” Trump said.

“Therefore, effective immediately, all national security tariffs under Section 232 and existing section 301, tariffs— they’re existing, they’re there— remain in place, fully in place, and in full force and effect. Today, I will sign an order to impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122, over and above our normal tariffs already being charged. And we’re also initiating several section 301, and other investigations to protect our country from unfair trading practices of other countries and companies.”

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the President to impose tariffs of 15% for 150 days with few limitations.

Trump later said that the amount of tariff revenue resulting from his new tariffs “could be far greater than the hundreds of billions we’ve already taken in.”

Trump further slammed the “major sleaze bags” behind the lawsuit to stop IEEPA tariffs and the Supreme Court, saying the court “doesn’t show great spirit toward our country in my opinion.”

WATCH:

Trump: There will no longer be any doubt, and the income coming in and the protection of our companies and country will actually increase because of this decision. I don’t think the court meant that, but it’s the way it is. Based on long standing law and hundreds of victories. And even, as I was pointed out before, even 1000s of victories over the years, to the contrary, the Supreme Court did not overrule tariffs. They merely overruled a particular use of IEEPA tariffs, and essentially it’s the use to use to get a fee. I can do anything I want with IEEPA, anything! I just can’t charge anybody for it. I can license. I just can’t charge them. It’s ridiculous, but it’s okay, because we have other ways, numerous other ways. The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country’s ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision.

So, now there’s no doubt, because, you know, there were a lot of questions about tariffs because no president was smart enough to use them to protect our country from those countries and businesses that were ripping us off. You took a look at the deficits that we had with some of these countries. It was disgraceful what they got away with for many, many decades. But now we know, because this decision affirms all those things that some people weren’t sure about. In order to protect— and it says so— in order to protect our country, a president can actually charge more tariffs than I was charging in the past period of a year under the various tariff authorities. So, we can use other of the statutes, other of the tariff authorities, which have also been confirmed and are fully allowed.

Therefore, effective immediately, all national security tariffs under Section 232 and existing section 301, tariffs— they’re existing, they’re there— remain in place, fully in place, and in full force and effect. Today, I will sign an order to impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122, over and above our normal tariffs already being charged. And we’re also initiating several section 301, and other investigations to protect our country from unfair trading practices of other countries and companies. Thank you for your attention to this matter. And I say, quite simply, which I’ve said for a long time, Make America Great Again. And interestingly, we’ve already made it great, so I don’t have to use that, but I don’t think we’ll ever give up on MAGA. MAGA’s always going to be with us.

If you have a few questions, you can let us know, but just to end, so we’re going forward. We will be able to take in more money, and there’ll no longer be doubt because there was always doubt. I know the people that brought the lawsuit, and they’re sleaze bags, major sleaze bags, but I know them, and they’re foreign country-centric. They were sending things into our country, and the people representing them knew full well, but they were sending things into our country, and they were beneficial to other countries, but very, very bad for us. And I stopped it, and we’ll just keep it going so we have more of a we have a totally firm decision now, and I don’t think the court meant it because the court doesn’t show great spirit toward our country in my opinion. A lot of bad decisions, but there are usually ways around it. This is something we could have done, as Justice Kavanaugh said, we could have done this originally, but we’re doing it now. And the numbers could be far greater than the hundreds of billions we’ve already taken in.

Trump’s comments to the press echo a statement he released on Truth Social earlier in the day, which he read in part during the briefing.

Full statement below:

To show you how ridiculous the opinion is, the Court said that I’m not allowed to charge even $1 DOLLAR to any Country under IEEPA, I assume to protect other Countries, not the United States which they should be interested in protecting — But I am allowed to cut off any and all Trade or Business with that same Country, even imposing a Foreign Country destroying embargo, and do anything else I want to do to them — How nonsensical is that? They are saying that I have the absolute right to license, but not the right to charge a license fee. What license has ever been issued without the right to charge a fee? But now the Court has given me the unquestioned right to ban all sorts of things from coming into our Country, a much more powerful Right than many people thought we had.

Our Country is the “HOTTEST” anywhere in the World, but now, I am going in a different direction, which is even stronger than our original choice. As Justice Kavanaugh wrote in his Dissent:

“Although I firmly disagree with the Court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a President’s ability to order tariffs going forward. That is because numerous other federal statutes authorize the President to impose tariffs and might justify most (if not all) of the tariffs issued in this case…Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232); the Trade Act of 1974 (Sections 122, 201, and 301); and the Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 338).”

Thank you Justice Kavanaugh!

In actuality, while I am sure they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court’s decision today made a President’s ability to both regulate Trade, and impose TARIFFS, more powerful and crystal clear, rather than less. There will no longer be any doubt, and the Income coming in, and the protection of our Companies and Country, will actually increase because of this decision. Based on longstanding Law and Hundreds of Victories to the contrary, the Supreme Court did not overrule TARIFFS, they merely overruled a particular use of IEEPA TARIFFS. The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a Foreign Country’s ability to conduct Trade with the United States under IEEPA, has been fully confirmed by this decision. In order to protect our Country, a President can actually charge more TARIFFS than I was charging in the past under the various other TARIFF authorities, which have also been confirmed, and fully allowed.

Therefore, effective immediately, all National Security TARIFFS, Section 232 and existing Section 301 TARIFFS, remain in place, and in full force and effect. Today I will sign an Order to impose a 10% GLOBAL TARIFF, under Section 122, over and above our normal TARIFFS already being charged, and we are also initiating several Section 301 and other Investigations to protect our Country from unfair Trading practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

The post WATCH: “I Don’t Think the Court Meant That, but It’s the Way It is” – Trump Says SCOTUS Actually Reaffirmed Tariff Powers, Announces 10% GLOBAL Tariffs and Investigation into Unfair Trading Practices of Other Countries and Companies appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jordan Conradson

Illegal Alien Accused of Trying to Randomly Drown Woman at Florida Beach Was Shielded from Deportation by Biden Admin.

Illegal Alien Accused of Trying to Randomly Drown Woman at Florida Beach Was Shielded from Deportation by Biden Admin.

Illegal Alien Accused of Trying to Randomly Drown Woman at Florida Beach Was Shielded from Deportation by Biden Admin.
February 20, 2026

Said Alexander Hernandez-Gonzalez, an illegal alien from Venezuela, told police he thought he'd killed the woman.

An illegal immigrant who is accused of attempted murder in a Florida incident was in the country because the Biden administration allowed him to stay.

Martin County Sheriff John Budensiek said a man identified as Said Alexander Hernandez-Gonzalez, 26, a Venezuelan, was charged with attempted first-degree premeditated murder in connection with the Feb. 12 incident, according to WPEC-TV.

The suspect, a resident of Port St. Lucie, Florida, is in the country illegally after his work visa expired.

Hernandez Gonzalez illegally entered the country in 2023 and was paroled by being granted temporary protected status, the Department of Homeland Security said in a news release.

“Said Alexander Hernandez Gonzalez — a product of the Biden administration’s open-border policies — brutally attacked a woman on the beach and attempted to drown and kill her,” Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said.


“She bravely fought back and survived this wicked attack. ICE has lodged an immigration detainer with the Martin County Sheriff’s office, and because of Florida’s cooperation with ICE, this sicko will never walk American streets again. Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the U.S.,” she said.

Budensiek said the woman was attacked on Stuart Beach and repeatedly held underwater, according to WPEC-TV.

“This is an extremely alarming case,” Budensiek said. “Random acts of violence like this are some of the most difficult crimes to solve — and that’s exactly what this was.”

Budensiek said the victim had gone to the beach alone “to clear her head” and was walking along the shore while on the phone with her sister when the attack took place.

“About five minutes after passing him, she was brutally attacked,” Budensiek said. “She was grabbed around the throat, dragged into the ocean, and held down as she struggled to break free.”

The victim’s phone was tossed in the water to prevent her from seeking help.

The victim was held underwater and eventually passed out.

“The next thing she recalled was waking up half in and half out of the water,” Budensiek said.

The victim eventually crawled out of the sea and made her way to the beach entrance, where she encountered Martin County deputies.

Although deputies had nothing to go on that night, three days later, they got a break when a woman called Port St. Lucie Police, saying her boyfriend was suicidal and that he had killed someone at the beach where the attack took place.

“That phone call is the reason we were able to solve this case,” Budensiek said.

Hernandez-Gonzalez later admitted that he believed the victim was recording him and “went into a rage.”

“He admitted he smacked the phone out of her hand, pulled her into the ocean, and tried to drown her,” Budensiek said. “He said he held her down until she went limp and believed she was deceased.”

Budensiek said the suspect did not show any remorse when told the victim survived.

“When asked if he felt any remorse, his response was, ‘No. I don’t feel nothing,’” Budensiek said.

Budensiek called the attack a disturbing act of random violence

“There was no relationship. There was no prior connection,” he said. “She did many of the right things — she was on the phone, her husband knew where she was — but you never know who you’re dealing with.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Illegal Alien Accused of Trying to Randomly Drown Woman at Florida Beach Was Shielded from Deportation by Biden Admin. appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jack Davis, The Western Journal