A deeply disturbed illegal alien admitted into America under the Biden regime has been caught after filming herself on social media committing an unspeakable act of child abuse.
As NBC Miami reported, the Miami-Dade Sheriff’s Office deputies responded to a call regarding an intentional fire set in the kitchen of a Miami home.
While there, they found 26-year-old Meliza Campos-Sanchez at the scene. She was taken by authorities to a local hospital for a mental health evaluation before being booked into jail.
Police later discovered two videos that revealed Campos-Sanchez’s actions were more disturbing than previously thought.
One video shows her singing in Spanish and dancing around her kitchen while holding a lighter, before deliberately dropping two articles of clothing onto the floor.
She then sprays the materials with what is reported to be rubbing alcohol and lights them on fire.
The second video is far more sinister. Campos-Sanchez is seen using lit candles to pour melted wax onto her leg and then onto the hands of her two young daughters.
She literally poured scorching hot wax on her own kids!
WATCH (warning on content):
ICE has lodged a detainer for this MIAMI MENACE who poured hot wax on her OWN CHILDREN.
Meliza Campos-Sanchez, an illegal alien from Cuba, was RELEASED into our nation by the Biden Administration and has been arrested for child abuse and arson.
Miami-Dade jail records obtained by NBC Miami show that Campos-Sanchez has been hit with multiple charges, including child abuse with no great bodily harm, child neglect with no great bodily harm, and arson.
On Friday, the United States Department of Homeland Security announced that ICE had issued a detainer requesting that officials not release Campos-Sanchez, who entered America illegally through Florida in May 2022.
“This Cuban illegal alien is charged with child abuse and arson after she poured hot wax onto one of her own children and then lit a fire in her home,” a DHS spokesperson said in a statement.
“If it weren’t for the Biden Administration’s reckless open-border policies, criminals like this woman would have never been able to enter our country,” the spokesperson added. “ICE has lodged a detainer asking that Miami officials not release this criminal from jail.”
“We will work with our partners in Florida to make sure she is removed from our country after she faces justice.”
How Important Are the Upcoming November Elections?
August 22, 2026
Ballots – fair use openverse
Guest post by Tim Meisburger
Assessing the Legitimacy of U.S. Elections
The vast majority of Americans, both Republican and Democrat, are in favor of commonsense electoral reforms, yet on the evening of July 16, the President gave a speech on challenges to election integrity in US elections, and ABC, NBC and CNN refused to carry it live. Politicians from both political parties, and their allies in the media and judiciary, are waging an all-out war against any reform aimed at increasing the transparency and credibility of elections. Plenty of Americans wonder why, and think (along with the President), “the only reason you wouldn’t do it (election reform) is because you want to cheat.”[1]
If elections are not free and fair, or are conducted in ways intentionally designed to prevent effective monitoring and verification, should candidates and voters who lose elections in November accept those loses as legitimate? To try to answer this question, we should compare our elections to the norms and standards international election observers use to assess elections overseas. Since I spent almost 30 years supporting, monitoring, and assessing foreign elections, beginning in 1992 as a U.N. District Electoral Supervisor in Cambodia’s transitional election, and ending in 2021 as Director of the Center for Democracy Rights and Governance in the first Trump Administration, I have relevant background to consider this issue.
Voter Registration
The foundation of fair elections are clean voter rolls, as they insure only eligible citizens can vote. Unqualified voters on voter rolls (people who are non-citizens, dead, moved, or never existed) enable many types of election fraud, as their names can be used to cast illegal ballots. Typical questions used to assess voter registration are:
Are voter rolls accurate and complete, including qualified voters and excluding unqualified people.
Are voter rolls public and auditable?
Assessment: Voter rolls are grossly inaccurate, and actually auditing voters rolls is often illegal, so U.S. voter rolls are ineffective at ensuring only qualified citizens can vote, and in preventing election fraud. Internationally, error rates in rolls, revealed by voter roll audits, are typically 3-6%. In the U.S., no one really knows our actual error rates, as Democrat (and some Republican) politicians and officials have fought in the courts and in the streets any attempts to conduct voter roll audits or to clean voter rolls, but we do know that some localities have more than twice the number people on their rolls as eligible citizens that live in the constituency (i.e. at least 100% error).
Voter ID
Voter ID is considered an essential element in election security, and the provision of photo or biometric voter ID is a major part of many U.S.-funded election assistance programs overseas. A question we might ask on this issue is:
Can every qualified voter easily obtain voter ID, and are unqualified voters prevented from obtaining voter ID?
Assessment: The situation is mixed, with Republican-led states more likely to meet this security standard, and Democrat-led states less likely. Although more than 80% of Americans (both Republicans and Democrats) support voter ID, and despite the fact that voter ID and proof of citizenship is required in every other democracy in the world, Democrat leaders continue to strenuously object to the universal introduction of photo voter ID and proof of citizenship to vote.
Early Voting
Many states now have early and extended voting periods, creating election seasons rather than a single election day. Extensive experience in developing democracies indicates that any time there is a break between voting and counting the votes caused by moving ballots or storing them overnight, transparency is interrupted, and public and candidate confidence in the legitimacy of the outcome decreases. A question relevant for this issue might be:
Is polling conducted so that it can be effectively monitored by non-partisan observers and pollwatchers?
Assessment: Due to a lack of transparency introduced by overnight and weekend breaks in the chain of observation, and a lack of resources required to deploy observers for extended periods, it is not possible for non-partisan observers or pollwatchers to effectively monitor and verify extended voting periods. Extended voting periods decrease transparency and facilitate fraud (or the suspicion of fraud), and undermine confidence in the legitimacy of election outcomes, which may decrease voter engagement and turnout. Extended voting enables corrupt administrators to determine likely results by counting Republican and Democrat voters, and because it is impossible to monitor effectively, allows the easy addition or subtraction of votes and manipulation of outcomes. Both politicians and voters support extended voting periods, not understanding how they facilitate fraud and ultimately undermine confidence in election outcomes.
Postal Voting
Originally limited largely to absentee voting for soldiers, by the late 90s and early 2000s postal voting was becoming increasingly popular for ordinary voting, even though the 2005 Bipartisan Commission on Election Reform (led by former President Carter) identified postal voting as the least secure election practice. Questions relevant for this issue include:
Does the polling process effectively prevent vote buying or selling?
Are ballots securely stored and monitored to prevent theft and ballot box stuffing?
Can voters cast their ballot in secret, free from influence or intimidation by family, employers or other powerful people in the community?
Assessment: Widespread or universal postal voting undermines the security and secrecy of the vote because it does not occur in a controlled environment, enabling vote theft, ballot box stuffing, vote buying and voter intimidation.
Voting and Counting Machines
Voting and counting machines have become ubiquitous in American elections, with proponents arguing they are cheaper, faster, and more secure than traditional voting and counting processes, while opponents argue the opposite, that they are more expensive, slower, and less secure. Questions relevant to assessing this issue include:
Can observers and pollwatchers effectively monitor and verify polling and counting processes?
Do polling and counting processes used in the election enhance or detract from voter confidence in the integrity of the process and legitimacy of elected representatives?
Assessment: Dur to their lack of transparency, it is not possible to effectively monitor and verify machine-based voting and counting, and this drives public doubt in the legitimacy of election outcomes. According to assessments by the intelligence community and essentially all cyber-security experts, voting and counting machines are extremely vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation by foreign and domestic bad actors. Prominent Democrat and Republican leaders have publicly blamed election losses on hacking of machines for decades, and a large portion of the voting population believe results are routinely manipulated.
Overall Assessment of U.S. Elections
Based on the identification of severe shortcomings in election procedures, our hypothetical international observation mission would find it impossible to verify and certify electoral outcomes as accurate expressions of the will of the people.
In such cases, observers would deny the legitimacy of elected representatives, and urge the people to continue their struggle for free and fair elections and real democracy. The mission would also make a series of recommendations for reforms required to ensure transparent and credible elections, like those below.
An Agenda for Transparent and Credible Elections
A democracy depends on public confidence that the process is fair, and that its representatives and leaders in government were legitimately elected by a majority of voters. Currently, that confidence in the U.S. is at its lowest level ever, and experience overseas demonstrates that a loss of confidence in the legitimacy of government can lead to a loss of social cohesion, autocracy, revolution, and blood in the streets.
This slide into instability and conflict is preventable through election reforms that increase the transparency and public credibility of election processes. Even those who think there is nothing wrong with our elections should recognize that growing public doubt in current election practices will ultimately result in instability, and that replacing those processes with transparent and verifiable procedures will enhance public confidence in the legitimacy of government.
With that in mind, I would make the following recommendations, all of which align with international standards and norms for free and fair elections, and all of which could be implemented for federal elections before the midterms through legislation or a presidential declaration of a national security emergency. States would not have to follow these reforms for state or local elections, but would be encouraged to do so.
Allow and conduct voter list audits in every state (voter list audits are a standard tool used by both monitoring organizations and election administrations throughout the world to assess the accuracy of voter rolls). Decertify current election rolls for federal elections and conduct a new registration in every state, building off the Real ID process used for driver’s licenses to ensure voters are qualified. With proper organization, this re-registration could be conducted in as little as four weeks, making it possible to implement before the mid-term elections.
Limit postal voting for federal elections to actual need. Postal voting is inherently insecure, so the volume of postal voting is inversely proportional to confidence in the legitimacy of the process. Postal votes undermine the secrecy of the ballot, are easy to manipulate, and facilitate vote buying and voter intimidation (particularly affected are less powerful minorities and women). This reform could be part of a presidential order, and states could implement the policy by simply going back to their absentee ballot rules of several decades ago.
Limit voting in federal elections to one day. Voting seasons are impossible to monitor effectively, creating doubt in the legitimacy of election outcomes. This reform could be part of a presidential order, and could be accompanied by a decree making Election Day a national holiday.
Require voter ID and proof of citizenship to register and vote in federal elections, as is normal and expected in every other country in the world. This reform could be part of a presidential order.
Eliminate non-transparent and non-monitorable election processes. In practice, this means eliminating voting and counting machines, which are non-transparent and cannot be effectively monitored and verified, thus contributing to public doubt in the legitimacy of election outcomes. Manual voting and counting processes are simple by design, and can be developed and introduced within a few weeks by drawing on international best practices for free and fair elections.
Count the votes in public at the precinct and post the results for all to see. Moving ballots before counting, or counting in secret or in a non-verifiable way, creates doubt in the legitimacy of the election process.
Conclusion:
All of these reforms are necessary to enhance public confidence in election outcomes and ensure we remain a government of the people. All are possible to implement before the November elections. Without significant reforms, the number of election deniers will continue to grow, leading ultimately, I fear, to tyranny or revolution.
Tim Meisburger is an election process and integrity expert with more than 30 years’ experience in international democracy and elections assistance. During the first Trump Administration, he served as the Director of the Center for Democracy Rights and Governance (DRG) at USAID, and during the second Administration, he led the Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance and served as Head of Programs for the Agency during the dissolution of USAID and transfer of humanitarian assistance to the Department of State. Between administrations, he continued to advance the President’s America First agenda as a Visiting Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, and as a consultant for the America Project, where he developed and managed election integrity programs for the 2021 elections in Virginia, and the 2022 and 2024 national elections. He writes frequently on the election process and foreign assistance reform.
MN Governor Hopeful Amy Klobuchar’s Claims of Fighting Fraud Hit with Receipts
August 22, 2026
Klobuchar
Minnesota Democratic gubernatorial candidate Amy Klobuchar is running to replace the face of fraud in Minnesota, Tim Walz. One of her political angles is to represent herself as a ‘fraud fighter,’ but her Republican opponent, Lisa Demuth (R), the current Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives, is exposing Klobuchar and bringing the receipts.
Klobuchar shared a video claiming, “It’s time for results, not excuses.”
But how engaged has Klobuchar been in acknowledging the fraud, let alone addressing it? According to a recent review of her press releases, not at all.
According to a review by Fox News Digital, “Klobuchar’s Senate office repeatedly issued press releases addressing other forms of fraud between 2022 and 2025, but a review of 1,000 of her official press-release archive found no release directly addressing or offering solutions to fix Minnesota’s sprawling social-services fraud scandal or Feeding Our Future.”
The Gateway Pundit reported that Aimee Bock, the convicted mastermind behind the $250 million Feeding Our Future scandal, was sentenced to 41.5 years in federal prison for her role in a massive scheme that fraudulently billed taxpayers for tens of millions of meals that were never provided to low-income children during the pandemic.
The fraud was centered in Minnesota’s large Somali community and involved dozens of defendants.
Bock, who founded Feeding Our Future, was convicted in March 2025 on multiple counts, including conspiracy, bribery, and wire fraud. She had been the central figure coordinating the operation that exploited relaxed federal rules during the COVID-19 emergency.
In June, The Gateway Pundit reported on a bombshell report by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Majority Staff, which concludes that Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison were repeatedly warned about widespread fraud in Minnesota’s taxpayer-funded programs for years, yet failed to take meaningful action while billions of dollars were allegedly siphoned from government programs.
According to the report, senior officials in the Walz administration and Ellison’s office were aware of credible fraud concerns as early as 2019 within the Minnesota Department of Human Services and by 2020 within the Minnesota Department of Education.
Yet, according to Fox’s review, “In more than 1,000 press releases from Klobuchar’s office from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2025, the Feeding our Future scandal was not mentioned in Klobuchar’s releases, nor were the terms ‘Minnesota fraud,’ ‘social services fraud,’ ‘Medicaid fraud,’ ‘autism fraud,’ ‘Housing Stabilization Services,’ ‘child nutrition fraud,’ ‘DHS fraud,’ or ‘nonprofit fraud.’
Demuth shared on X, “Sen. Amy Klobuchar issued more than 1,000 press releases from January 2022 through the end of 2025.”
“Not a single press release mentioned the fraud scandal that has plagued Minnesota.”
“Billions of our tax dollars stolen. It’s time for change.”
Sen. Amy Klobuchar issued more than 1,000 press releases from January 2022 through the end of 2025.
Not a single press release mentioned the fraud scandal that has plagued Minnesota.
EXCLUSIVE – Should We Rethink The Senate’s Role In Government? – Is A Convention Of States Necessary To Decide The Future Of The Senate?
August 22, 2026
The Senate is seemingly becoming increasingly obsolete in the eyes in the American people as time goes on.
The upper chamber often fails to pass bills because the just refuse to get rid of the filibuster. So what’s the point?
The most notable bill being the SAVE Act, which passed through the House, but continues to stall in the Senate. All the Senators went on vacation for August Recess without passing the bill.
The Gateway Pundit spoke with a patriot in North Carolina, Thomas Jacobs, who hopes to write out the frustrations the American people have with the upper chamber.
Jacobs suggested instead of getting rid of the filibuster, we should just “Nuke the Senate,” which led to concerned comments about repelling the 17th amendment, which established that each state will have two Senators.
Jacobs spoke to TGP after he read some of these concerns about repealing the 17th.
“There were many comments about repealing the 17th Amendment. A few comments questioned why that was not referenced in the article. I am not in favor of repealing the 17th Amendment, at least for now. The reason is simple: I would rather have the American people elect their representatives rather than a legislature of elected politicians selecting my representative. The Senate is a small sample of that scenario. Senator Thune was not elected by the people to serve as Majority Leader. I do not know anyone who would vote for him,” Jacobs told TGP.
“The sad part is that I am old enough to remember a United States Senate where the words were on another level of oratory and rhetorical speech. I remember a Senate that respected different points of view and actually was a deliberative body. Today, Congress is a place where shouting matches regularly occur, including the use of insults and foul language. When you watch any congressional hearing, witnesses are battered, verbally abused, and interrupted more often than not, while not being allowed to answer questions.”
The insults and foul language has turned the Senate into a high-school-like setting.
“We used to call our elected representatives ‘the Honorable _____.’ They lost that title because they do not deserve it. Americans deserve better. If we do not demand better, we deserve the status quo.”
Jacobs suggested reducing the size of the committees in the Senate and called for a Convention of States, as outlined in Article V of the Constitution.
“Here are some possible solutions: Cut the size of all Committees to half. That alone would give more time for Q&A. Mute all microphones other than the person speaking. I realize this opens the opportunity for lengthy answers that do not answer the question. The Committee Chairman would be responsible for intervening and instructing the witness to answer the question,” Jacobs told TGP.
“The Founding Fathers pledged their lives and their fortunes to establish this nation. We need to return to our founding documents. It is the God-given wisdom of our Founding Fathers in writing those documents that have preserved this nation for 250 years. And within those founding documents, they gave the American people the ability to circumvent an elitist, entitled, and underperforming Congress. The Convention of States is one of the most brilliant and most overlooked ideas to be included in our Constitution.”
Jacobs points to the original vision of the Founding Fathers on why he believes a Convention of States would be necessary.
“The Founders could not and did not envision the concept of a professional politician, which is what we have today. Money and power are human drivers. Always have been, always will be. I do think they had a great understanding of human nature. I think that is the reason they included the Convention of States as a safeguard against a recalcitrant Congress,” Jacobs told TGP.
“I think the only way a Convention of States would work would be if there were a limit to the number of topics to be discussed. Four topics would be enough. I would suggest the Save America Act, term limits on Congress while also reducing the Senate’s tenure from six years to four years, limiting the Supreme Court to nine justices, and a Balanced Budget Amendment. Any other topic would be declared null and void, or out of bounds.”
Jacobs also argues that the size of the Supreme Court should be reduced, which contrasts to what National Democrats are trying to do, which is unconstitutionally pack the court:
“The Save America Act has an 80/20 ratio for passing by the American people. The idea of reducing the Senate’s term and term limits was discussed in the previous article. Supreme Court should have a limited number of Justices. Once one expands the number, it sets the precedent to expand the lower courts until the desired outcome, control of the Judiciary, is reached. (I am aware that the blue states will not want to pass that amendment. It is just like the filibuster situation. The Democrats have already said they will try to pack the court. President Trump should simply state that if the amendment does not pass, he will pack the court with conservative justices now. It is the political version of the Golden Rule: Do unto others before they do unto you.)”
Jacobs ends the conversation by tapping into some of the shared frustrations with the upper chamber that are on the rise with the American people such as the National Debt, balancing the budget, and government shutdowns.
“The Balanced-Budget Amendment is long overdue. This nation is $40 trillion in debt. This nation borrows money to give away. One of the largest and fastest-growing areas of the budget is interest on the debt. No more government shutdowns. No more Continuing Resolutions. Congress will never pass such an amendment because it is not their money that they are spending,” Jacobs told TGP.
“Assuming that a Convention was called, and three or four items were presented and possibly passed, the final act of the Convention would be to propose a list of items for future conventions. Given that a Convention of States had been called and produced positive results of the American people, by the American people, and for the American people, Congress would have two options: (1) face the realization that other Conventions could be called and Congress would become obsolete over time; (2) Congress could return to representing and serving their constituents, their states, and their country. It would be their choice. If they are already approaching irrelevance, then obsolescence is not far behind.”
As the Senate continues to fail to do their job, while taking extended breaks from work during August Recess and getting paid the same six figure salary, it’s no wonder why the general public is frustrated.
Patriots like Jacobs, are tired of seeing this sort of thing happen. Should we “Nuke the Senate?” Is a Convention of States needed? Has the Senate drifted too far from the Founders original principles?
“Call a Convention of States, select the topics, and stay disciplined, televise the whole thing nationally, and return the nation to the Founders’ God-given wisdom.”
Toxic Hollywood Leftist Mark Ruffalo Slams Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger with a Side of Jewish Hate
August 22, 2026
Image: @markruffalo/Instagram
Woke Hollywood leftist actor Mark Ruffalo went on Instagram Story on Friday to slam Paramount Skydance’s pending $111 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.
He couldn’t help adding a twist of hate to his argument by attacking the Jewish people involved in the merger.
Ruffalo reposted a video to his Instagram Story of Oracle’s executive vice chair Safra Catz boasting about the company’s efforts to help Israel in the wake of the terror attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, that saw Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups kill 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals with another 251 people being abducted.
Catz, who is Israeli, said the following on a panel a few years ago: There’s a few things that we did that I really can’t talk about to advance the agenda for the Israeli military. But we have some really profoundly scary technology at Oracle and we wanted to make sure that it was available for the effort. Let’s just say that, okay?’
Ruffalo then shared the following on subsequent slides, pushing the concept that there is a “genocide” against Palestinians while failing to even address the October 7 terrorist attacks on civilians.
“This is the company that Larry Ellison is using to fund his son David’s Warner Bros acquisition,” Ruffalo wrote.
“These ‘really profoundly scary technologies’ will most likely be merged into one of the largest media conglomerates in the world and one day used on you. Look how she revels in what we now have come to see as a genocide, which was built on an apartheid system of oppression powered by Oracle.”
“There is an old saying. ‘The way you do one thing is the way you do everything.’”
“From one of the biggest tech companies in the world. Powering some of the most destructive and inhuman forces in the world. Why has Trump pushed this illegal merger through?”
“Larry Ellison will own most of ‘Para Bros.’ Larry is a classic Oligarch. They are crushing workers and consolidating the wealth of the world for their own power and concentrated dominance.”
“We have a chance to stop this. There are 12 state Attorneys General suing to block this merger. It will be catastrophic for our film industry.”
“There will be a loss of 4500 direct film making jobs and the loss of another 10k ancillary jobs. Merger like this are almost always bad for workers, consumers, and the industry they tend to dominate. It’s a classic antitrust case.”
“It will hike up the cost of cable and flatten out competition. This means less choice for our audiences. It also concentrates an enormous amount of creative control to companies that say and do things like this strange woman from Oracle.”
“Really profoundly Scary people.”
Ruffalo’s Trump Derangement Syndrome and his MAGA supporters is so deeply embedded, in 2024, he posted faked AI-generated images of Trump with young girls to push a false narrative about Epstein Island.
When caught, instead of admitting his mistake and failure to spend even a minute on due diligence, he blamed Elon Musk for “allowing so much disinformation” on X.
Ruffalo’s lack of compassion was called out by “The Office” star Rainn Wilson, who recounted some of his liberal friends having a “kind of a good riddance” reaction to the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk last week.
“I spoke to a couple of — let’s say — some liberal friends last night at an event, and they were like, ‘You won’t find me shedding any tears,’ and someone else was like, ‘Oh well.’ There was a little bit of a, kind of a good riddance thing, and it’s like, ‘Guys, no,” he told actor Mark Ruffalo. “We cannot think or talk that way. That is not okay.”
Evergrande’s Founder Sentenced to Life in Prison in China Court After Firm’s Default of $300 Billion in Liabilities
August 22, 2026
Evergrande’s Founder Sentenced to Life in Prison in China Court After Firm’s Default of $300 Billion in Liabilities
The AP reported this week on the latest in the Evergrande bankruptcy:
Chinese authorities are moving to finish cleaning up the mess left by the collapse of the Evergrande real estate empire, years after its default with some $300 billion in liabilities.
A court in southern China’s Guangzhou said Friday it had accepted a bankruptcy liquidation case against Evergrande’s mainland Chinese property development unit, which according to industry data accounted for much of the group’s overall debt.
That came a day after a court in the city of Shenzhen sentenced China Evergrande’s 67-year-old founder Hui Kan Yan to life in prison for financial crimes. On the same day, dozens of others tied to the group, including Hui’s sons, also were sentenced to prison terms of up to 18 years.
The China economy is in trouble, like the rest of the world’s economies. The Evergrande failure has been in the works for some time now. Once one of the most prestigious firms in China, it’s now facing bankruptcy.
The founder of Evergrande is lucky to still be alive.
In 2023, the world began to see China’s economy falter. We reported on a report at the Business Insider.
It’s been clear for years that the Chinese real-estate market has been in trouble. China has a population of 1.4 billion, but it has built housing for a population of 3 billion, according to expert estimates. Many of the mega-developments became empty monuments to Beijing’s insatiable desire for growth. In Shenyang, farmers have taken over a development of empty mansions for cattle grazing.
At that time, real estate giant Evergrand began reporting problems. Now its founder is in prison for life.
In response, the government instituted a law saying that it will not allow some people to leave the country, maybe.
China Just Made “Maybe” a Crime. Now Everyone Is a Flight Risk.
Beijing has quietly redrawn the line between citizen and suspect, and it did it with a single word.
Under China’s new Regulations on Exit and Entry Administration, effective September 15 but already being trialed at some ports, one term appears again and again: “may.” Not “did.” Not “will.” May. If an official decides you “may endanger national security, interests, industrial security, or technical security,” you can be barred from leaving the country. Nowhere does the text define what “may endanger” actually means.
That vagueness is the point. The power to stop you at the border has been pushed all the way down the chain, provincial governments, the Commerce Ministry, even county-level offices can now decide who flies and who stays. As geopolitics scholar Chen Wen-chia puts it: you’re no longer flagged for what you did, but for what someone imagines you might do.
This is the machinery of a paranoid state, jumping at its own shadow. China has flipped its legal logic from punishing crimes after the fact to preventing exit before anything happens. State firms are reportedly already tightening travel approvals for staff. Those labeled a “threat” abroad can be blocked from leaving for six months to three years after they return.
Why now? Because the regime is scared. With the economy sagging and public anger simmering, Beijing fears its own people voting with their feet, and fears even more what they say when they come back. Engineers in semiconductors, AI, and finance should read the fine print: you may be next on the watchlist.
The message to 1.4 billion people is chillingly simple: the door is closing, and no one will tell you why. (Aric’s note: Regarding China’s current population, some analyses and experts believe it is far smaller than the official figures claim, though the actual data remains unclear.)
If you’re planning to leave China, understand the rules before they understand you.
ACI — Aric Chen | Insights
Editor’s note: The video is a related news segment from the World News I anchor.
China Just Made “Maybe” a Crime. Now Everyone Is a Flight Risk.
Beijing has quietly redrawn the line between citizen and suspect, and it did it with a single word.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
: China
